In a relatively calm Chinese Grand Prix, the “hot” moments could be counted on the fingers of one hand. One of them concerned Ferrari when asked to Lewis Hamilton to let it pass Charles Leclerc, on a better pace than him despite a clearly damaged front wing.
A strategy often implemented by teams when one of their drivers is faster than the other. Nothing unusual, in short. And yet, the scene caused a stir when Lewis Hamilton's radio call was broadcast on television. Asked to open the door for Charles Leclerc on lap 20, the seven-time world champion didn't immediately comply, telling his engineer Riccardo Adami that his teammate wasn't close enough to avoid losing time.
It wasn't until the first corner of the following lap that the two men swapped positions. A highly mundane situation that nonetheless attracted criticism, as Lewis Hamilton's tone could have been interpreted as that of an annoyed person at the time of the broadcast. This irritated the Reds, even though Frédéric Vasseur had insisted that it was his new recruit who had taken the initiative.
« I think this is a FOM joke, indicated the director of the Scuderia. The first call came from Lewis. But to make a show of it, they changed the situation by only broadcasting the second part of the radio exchange. »
FOM deplores bad timing
So, was this exchange contrived by Liberty Media to make people believe there was some animosity between Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc after only two Grands Prix together?
FOM (Formula One Management) responded to the incident, saying the goal was not to sell the public a tension that did not actually exist. There was absolutely no intention to present a misleading account regarding the Ferrari radio exchange., assured a spokesperson with RaceFans. Due to other situations that arose during the race, Lewis's message was not broadcast, but this was not intentional.. » Hoping that this will convince Frédéric Vasseur.
ALSO READ > "No intention of gaining any advantage": Ferrari reacts to Leclerc and Hamilton disqualifications
SYLVAIN DUCREUX
25/03/2025 at 02:56 a.m.
This is exactly the kind of situation that turns a sport into a spectacle and makes me no longer find myself attracted to F1. Like every year since 2018, I watch the first GPs of the year, get bored while watching them, and then focus on MotoGP afterward. I admit that Liberty Media's takeover of MotoGP isn't the most reassuring...
Yves-Henri RANDIER
25/03/2025 at 02:24 a.m.
FOM, Liberty Media, Netflix, the American footprint on F1... When will radio communications be phased out? F1 has managed without them for decades, but that will mean a few grams less weight in the single-seaters.
vincent moyet
25/03/2025 at 12:23 a.m.
Team choices are crucial in a career. Ask Alonso or, in the past, Carlos Reutemann... Hamilton had the good sense to go to Mercedes in 2013, but he may have missed his bet this time. In his time, Schumacher patiently led Ferrari back to the top, but Hamilton no longer has as much time on his hands.
Lucas Paul
25/03/2025 at 10:10 a.m.
But finally, how can we doubt what His Majesty says... As I predicted, the fall will be painful! And given what Russel and Andrea are doing on their Mercedes at the moment, he must be asking himself questions!!!
DANIEL MEYERS
25/03/2025 at 09:48 a.m.
"made with Liberty Media sauce" No, with Netflix sauce! "There was absolutely no intention of presenting a misleading story" My eye I think, just like Fred Vasseur must think. Those who decide who and what is on TV were 'clever' enough to believe that it would go down well according to the adage: The bigger it is, the better it goes, an alternative truth in short! (very widely used at the moment at the top of the American state and as good Americans why not follow the example!?) As Mr. Audiard so aptly says to Lino Ventura: 'The idiots dare everything, that's how we recognize them'