This is unlikely to improve the already tense relations between the FIA and the drivers and teams. For several months, the Federation, led by its highly publicized president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, has been aiming to gain more control over the image of the Formula 1 returned by the main actors.
A few weeks ago, the world motorsport regulator caused a stir when it published the "new" sanctions for misconduct that could be applied to drivers in the event of an infringement in the future. These have been drastically increased ranging from simple financial penalties to the withdrawal of points and even suspension in the event of a repeat offence.
A policy that is in line with that seen in 2024 when certain drivers were singled out by the FIA. Max Verstappen had even gone on a crusade against it, boycotting official press conferences in Singapore after being sentenced to community service for publicly uttering an insult (the "f word"). This same term had cost 10 euros, 000 of which was suspended, Charles Leclerc after letting him escape in Mexico, in a more offbeat sequence.
The FIA's new target and Mohammed Ben Sulayem
Still in this perspective, while anger is rising among the pilots (who had already acted through their association, the GPDA), Mohammed Ben Sulayem has made it clear that the FIA could now take action against live radio communications. His goal? To limit the use of swear words during broadcasts. To achieve this, the president of the federation is exploring different avenues.
« Do we continue on our path by cutting off live radio communications? Maybe?, said the Dubai native during an event with selected media at the Jarama circuit in Madrid to discuss the upcoming Grand Prix in the Spanish capital. Will we delay? [their diffusion] ? Maybe. There are a lot of things we will work on with our promoters. We are still the owners of the championship.. » His popularity rating is not expected to increase...
ALSO READ > Sanctions for misconduct: is the FIA going too far?
D'ASSUNCAO JEAN BERNARD
11/02/2025 at 01:39 a.m.
I think Mohammed Ben Sulayem should change his policy and move towards defending F1 drivers!!!!
PHILIPPE MOURET
11/02/2025 at 11:45 a.m.
I said it in a previous comment! The next step is virtual press conferences with avatars whose speech will be formatted by AI. This F1 where nothing should exceed bores me!
Michel Vaillant
10/02/2025 at 08:10 a.m.
It's really an obsession for some to send this man back to his nationality. Strange, when Sébastien Loeb complained about the decision to ban him from continuing the Dakar, no one here wrote "This Frenchman", as if grumbling was a national trait (and that the "national trait" is a tangible reality, too...). And besides, for example, when Jean Todt was president and we heard much less live discussions (while the technical means were there) no one complained about presidential censorship. Nice example of "double standards". That said, basically, if we beep insults (which allows us to have an idea of the internal atmosphere, as has been rightly pointed out, without having to tell ourselves that it's perhaps not what we want to watch with our children) or we delay the public broadcast of conversations so that we no longer hear the name-calling, I don't really see the problem. It's not listening to adults under extreme stress not paying attention to what they say that makes us love, watch and listen to this sport. If we broadcast something, it has to help us appreciate what we're watching. In this perspective, insults are perfectly useless and dispensable (unless we want to keep Verstappen or Leclerc's false image of a dog on steroids and forget everything they're doing at the same time). Offering instead technical information, interviews with members of the technical team in the pits, that would be much more useful, and would rebalance the show-technical balance that many of us here do not consider optimal. And to anticipate the two-penny argument, there is no censorship, or rather it is already exercised by the producers of F1 since we only receive on our screens what they have decided to make us hear, i.e. a tiny part of the wall-single-seater exchanges throughout a race.
Jacques Morin
10/02/2025 at 06:49 a.m.
There was a time when radio communications were one-way: driver to pit. The latter could then warn of his imminent arrival to change tires... it was not bad indeed but as far as the concern of the FIA and its President is concerned, it would not change anything since in general, the "bad words" come from the drivers and not from the pits. From a purely sporting point of view it could be good to return to this one-way (we talk about it for cycling), with just the right to communicate to the driver the instructions of the race direction to warn of a danger for example... however, my greatest post-race pleasure is precisely to listen to these conversations which teach a lot about the internal mood of the teams... In the end, let's leave things as they are and f... to the one who will listen!
Horn
10/02/2025 at 06:46 a.m.
Hello. At 280KM in a curve and kept a cool head and thought that you are going to get a fine or lose points because some want to listen to "FIA" we should let the teams and their drivers do it among themselves because the competition listens
Yves-Henri RANDIER
10/02/2025 at 06:09 a.m.
The presidential censorship of an Emirati in love with full power and needing to prove that "the FIA is back" and that he exists? That being said, radio links did not exist for decades and that did not make the races less interesting. When we see certain lacks of communication in qualifying with drivers in outlap when a driver in flying lap arrives while the communications were supposedly intended mainly for safety on the track, we can question the relevance of the radio. Long live the return of the signage and less assistance to the driver from the wall and the pit!
DOG
10/02/2025 at 01:32 a.m.
That would be good. As before, use of the paneling and the pilot to figure it out and no longer be directed.
vincent moyet
10/02/2025 at 01:11 a.m.
This is really a ridiculous fight, stirring up trouble to make people believe that we exist. And how does he intend to ban the frequent middle fingers? By tying drivers' hands to the steering wheel? If ridicule killed, he would have been dead a while ago.