The sequence of turns 9 and 10 in Melbourne, that left-right corner taken at full speed, was one of the most impressive checkpoints on the calendar, one of those that leaves its mark on the season.
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 95% left to discover.
Already subscribed?
Sign in
- Up to -50% savings!
- Unlimited Premium articles
- The digital magazine from 20 p.m. every Monday
- Access to all issues since 2012 on the AUTOhebdo app
Read also
vincent moyet
09/03/2026 at 10:57 a.m.
Hervé, thank you for the clarification. If we don't want to see the drivers lifting off the throttle halfway down the straight at Monza, we'll have to find a solution. To François: And who defines what constitutes a spectacle? Cars overtaking and re-overtaking each other on the straights at the touch of a button—who finds that entertaining? Ten-year-olds? Whereas drivers chasing each other, gaining or losing tenths of a second, that's breathtaking. Now that's suspense, not childish entertainment.
Herve 06
09/03/2026 at 06:20 a.m.
Absolutely Vincent Moynet: "If I understand correctly, if the battery discharge was less rapid, all the cars would be overall a little less powerful but would retain this power for longer," and I would add: "and would need me charging time, so we need to find the right ratio to avoid super-clipping, which is an aberration in motor racing."
Samson François
09/03/2026 at 05:53 a.m.
As a young enthusiast (82 years old), I am appalled by the decline of F1, which is supposed to be a spectacle. Everything is becoming artificial, and I find real entertainment watching F3 and F2 races. My solution: a single chassis and a single, supplied fuel volume. Total freedom for engine architecture, because that's where real progress is needed. Aerodynamic improvements are of little importance for our cars, which only reach a maximum speed of 130 km/h.
Joel Gaboriaud
09/03/2026 at 05:06 a.m.
Thank you Cyprien for this clear and precise analysis. It's a welcome change from many other bland and repetitive ones.
vincent moyet
09/03/2026 at 04:49 a.m.
This is probably a solution that will be necessary for large circuits with few braking points (Monza being the prime example), otherwise chicanes will have to be added in the middle of the straight to be able to recharge the batteries.
vincent moyet
09/03/2026 at 04:46 a.m.
If I understand correctly, if the battery discharged less quickly, all the cars would be generally a little less powerful but would maintain that power for longer, instead of a constant yo-yo between empty and full battery? This would undoubtedly be a bit more rational for the drivers and what we see on the track, without changing the 50/50 ratio of combustion to electric power. We'll have to see if the FIA (and especially Liberty Media, which is pulling the strings) wants Mario Kart or Formula 1... There are probably still some adjustments to be made.
Herve 06
09/03/2026 at 02:29 a.m.
It should be possible, for example, to limit the power of the electric motor to 50% for the majority of the lap and leave only 2 or 3 seconds of the lap at full power to satisfy the 50-50 sales pitch.
Herve 06
09/03/2026 at 02:24 a.m.
It will likely be necessary to adopt a more favorable charge/discharge ratio, thus allowing for more rationed use of the electric motor's power, so that charging phases are less demanding on a lap and avoid the need for super-clipping. It's up to the federation to figure out how to implement these restrictions on electrical power usage without losing face.