An agreement in principle has been signed to abandon the 50/50 thermal-electric split for F1 cars in 2027.

The FIA ​​announced on Friday, May 8, that an agreement in principle had been reached to modify the power distribution between the internal combustion engine and the electric system in Formula 1 from 2027. A direct response to the criticism that has been accumulating since the beginning of the season on the current engine formula.

Published 09/05/2026 à 12:00

Zoé Ledent-Mouret

  Comment on this article! 9

An agreement in principle has been signed to abandon the 50/50 thermal-electric split for F1 cars in 2027.

© DPPI

The observation has been shared by almost the entire paddock since the start of the 2026 season: the near-equal distribution between thermal and electric power — close to 50/50 — has profoundly altered the nature of driving. F1Qualifying is now contested with omnipresent energy management, with cars slowing down even before braking zones to recover energy, and the speed differences between a car in deployment phase and another in recovery phase have created dangerous situations — Oliver Bearman's accident at Suzuka, involving Franco Colapinto who was not recovering energy in a significant way, remains the most striking image.

Adjustments had already been introduced to the Formula 1 cars in Miami, including an increase in super clipping from 250 kW (335 hp) to 350 kW (469 hp) to allow drivers to recover more energy at full throttle, and a reduction in the amount of energy allowed in qualifying from 8 to 7 MJ. The FIA ​​indicates that these changes produced "Improved competition and represents a step in the right direction"However, this is not enough to solve the underlying problem. Truly significant adjustments require physical modifications to the power units—impossible to implement during the current season, but realistic for 2027.

A rebalancing of 50 kW in each direction

The agreement in principle reached on Friday includes two symmetrical modifications: an increase in the internal combustion engine's power output of approximately 50 kW—achieved through an increase in fuel flow, bringing the thermal output to around 400 kW (536 hp)—and an equivalent reduction of 50 kW in the power output of the energy recovery system, which would decrease from approximately 350 kW to approximately 300 kW (402 hp). The net result would be a power split close to 60/40 in favor of the internal combustion engine, moving away from the current 50/50 split that many drivers and paddock personnel consider problematic.

The underlying idea is twofold: on the one hand, increasing thermal power makes it easier to recover the reduced amount of electrical energy allowed, mechanically reducing super-clipping phases at the end of the straights. On the other hand, decreasing the available electrical power mitigates the impact of energy recovery phases on the car's handling and the speed differences between drivers. The expected result is a more traditional speed curve, more predictable cars, and more intuitive driving.

Visu Alpine from 07/05/26

The increased fuel flow rate potentially implies hardware modifications to the power units—which is precisely why this measure is being considered for the 2027 F1 cars rather than being implemented immediately, to allow manufacturers time to adapt their engines. The chassis will also need slight modifications to accommodate larger fuel tanks.

A process to be finalized

These measures are not official at this stage. The so-called "agreement in principle" still needs to follow the usual governance process: a vote by the power unit manufacturers, followed by ratification by the FIA ​​World Motor Sport Council via electronic voting. The FIA ​​indicates, however, that this agreement was reached "unanimously" at the meeting on Friday, May 8, suggesting that formal validation should not pose a major obstacle.

Further technical discussions within working groups comprised of teams and power unit manufacturers will be necessary before the finalization of the exact package. The FIA ​​also specifies that the evaluation of the adjustments introduced in Miami is ongoing with a view to potential additional modifications for future rounds—including revisions to safety at the start and measures specific to wet conditions, as well as improvements to visual signals planned for the Canadian Grand Prix, from May 22 to 24.

ALSO READ > The FIA's first step falls far short: "Further changes are still needed" in F1

Autohebdo Store

See the shop

Comment on this article! 9

Continue reading on these topics:

Read also

Comments

9 Comment (s)

V

vincent moyet

15/05/2026 at 12:19 a.m.

Hervé, I was just thinking about that. All of this should have been shown in the simulations. I'm afraid the decision-makers get their positions through nepotism precisely because they're well-paid or for political reasons, as is unfortunately the norm in many organizations. As a result, no one dared to speak the truth in organizations where everyone has everyone else wrapped around their little dirty little deals. And what about the fiasco of the start tests during the winter trials? It's utter amateurism.

H

Herve 06

13/05/2026 at 09:07 a.m.

I'm always amazed by the incompetence of people who are supposed to be experts and are handsomely paid. All of this was predictable given the simulations' performance; some had even predicted it. Fortunes were invested in development, and these decision-makers perpetuated their incompetence to the bitter end, until F1 was ridiculed, waiting for the disaster to be confirmed before reacting. How sad!

G

Guillaume B.

11/05/2026 at 07:34 a.m.

I think they should still wait for Marine Tondelier's opinion...

Yves-Henri RANDIER

11/05/2026 at 12:51 a.m.

The 2026 regulations were so brilliant that after only four Grands Prix, they're being changed for 2027. Beyond Vincent's pertinent remarks, we can nevertheless applaud the very American pragmatism... even if a major question mark remains: is it truly applicable from 2027 onwards? By altering the efficiency of the internal combustion engine, this could impact the fuel tank and therefore the chassis... some teams were planning to keep their chassis for the 2027 season! It will be interesting to see the impact this will have on the budget cap and the development race for 2026.

V

vincent moyet

11/05/2026 at 12:10 a.m.

It's worth adding that the wasted time, energy, and money thrown away with this idiotic regulation followed by such a complete about-face are solely the result of the arrogance of leaders who have let power go to their heads and refuse to listen to anyone who warns them they're heading for disaster. This is serious.

V

vincent moyet

11/05/2026 at 12:06 a.m.

I thought the show was fantastic and that the fans loved it, according to Domenicali?? F1 certainly isn't afraid of looking ridiculous, first by being ridiculed by almost all observers and even drivers, then by making grand pronouncements and changing course immediately afterward. If F1 wants to maintain any credibility, it's going to have to stop this circus. Well... only fools never change their minds, that's something.

P

Paul Lucas

10/05/2026 at 09:19 a.m.

Well said, Léon... But "by any chance," has the FIA ​​heard rumors of possible driver strikes??? :):):)

A

Alain Féguenne (🇱🇺 Luxembourg)

09/05/2026 at 10:13 a.m.

Finally… sensible decisions… from the FIA ​​& BS… for the 2027 season… 😎👀👍

H

Hilton Leon

09/05/2026 at 12:33 a.m.

Which goes to show that internal combustion engines are the future, and electric vehicles are the past!

Write a comment