Toto Wolff responds to criticism of the 2026 F1 cars: "It has to be exciting for the fans."

The first race of the 2026 season Formula 1 The race in Melbourne didn't just launch a new championship; it also reignited the debate surrounding the technical regulations that came into effect this year. Following the double victories of Mercedes Benz In qualifying, he was eight-tenths of a second behind Isack Hadjar in third position, and then in the race, fifteen seconds behind the Ferraris of Charles Leclerc et Lewis HamiltonSeveral drivers have expressed reservations about the behavior of the new single-seaters.

At the heart of the criticism: energy management and the crucial role of the electric components in the power units. The new engine concept relies on a near-equal split between thermal and electric power, forcing drivers to manage energy recovery and use much more precisely during races. On a circuit like Albert Park, particularly demanding in this respect, this has resulted in unusual strategies, such as more frequent early "lift and coast" phases or slowing down on the straights to recharge the battery. Some drivers have even found themselves on the starting grid with an empty battery after the formation lap.

“We’ve gone from the best cars […] to the worst.”

Several drivers felt that these constraints profoundly altered the way the race unfolded. Some specifically mentioned situations they considered artificial or difficult to anticipate on the track, particularly when some cars slowed down to recover energy while others were running at full power. In some cases, the speed differences reached several tens of kilometers per hour. The criticism was particularly noticeable after the Australian Grand Prix. The reigning world champion, Lando NorrisHe did not hide his dissatisfaction with the new cars: "We've gone from the best cars ever built in Formula 1, and the most enjoyable to drive, to probably the worst. It's rubbish."

Other drivers also expressed reservations about how the race was unfolding, some mentioning a driving dynamic very different from what they had experienced before. The new energy restrictions were particularly singled out for their impact on race pace and how overtaking maneuvers were managed.

"We tend to be very nostalgic."

When questioned after his weekend in Melbourne, the Mercedes team principal, Toto wolffHe downplayed these criticisms. According to him, judgments made about previous generations of single-seaters are often influenced by a form of nostalgia. "I haven't heard any drivers speak in particularly complimentary terms about previous cars and say that they were the best."

For the Austrian, it's natural for drivers to react to such significant technical changes, but these reactions must be placed in a broader context. Formula 1, he reminds us, remains a sport where numerous stakeholders—teams, manufacturers, governing bodies, and promoters—all have a direct interest in the evolution of the product. “We tend to be very nostalgic and focus on the past. It’s clear that we are all stakeholders in this sport. We need an exceptional show, the best cars in the world, and the best drivers. It has to be exciting for the fans.”

The head of the Mercedes-Benz company also emphasizes a key point: the drivers' feelings are important, but they are not the only indicator for judging the success of a regulation: "The drivers' point of view is an important perspective. But... Stefano [Domenicali] would say that the only thing that matters to him is that the fans enjoy it." In this context, public reaction and the appeal of the spectacle remain the primary criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of these new rules. If the product resonates with spectators, the sport can consider the transition to this new generation of cars a success.

A possible change in regulations

Toto Wolff, however, points out that Formula 1 has some leeway to adjust its regulations if necessary. The governing bodies and teams can intervene to correct certain technical aspects if these prove problematic as the season progresses. "If changes need to be made, if we need to adapt, I think Formula 1 offers us the flexibility to always make these kinds of decisions."

For Mercedes, the first race of the season was certainly a resounding success. The team dominated the weekend in Melbourne, maintaining their one-two finish in qualifying after the Grand Prix. This successful start to the season contrasts sharply with the doubts expressed elsewhere in the paddock and could give the German team an ideal position to enter into the initial discussions regarding regulatory changes.

ALSO READ > New F1 regulations: Drivers are divided